<kbd id='gsnqchy2'></kbd><address id='gsnqchy2'><style id='gsnqchy2'></style></address><button id='gsnqchy2'></button>

              <kbd id='uwt3wfko'></kbd><address id='uwt3wfko'><style id='uwt3wfko'></style></address><button id='uwt3wfko'></button>

                  通知公告

                  您現在的位置是:首頁 > 通知公告 > 正文

                  “結網織史:歷史中的聯繫及其再現”申博會

                  發佈者:歷史學院 發佈時間:2017-09-29 10:29:00 閱讀量:

                  “寫歷史:實踐中的反思”系列會議之三:
                  “結網織史:歷史中的聯繫及其再現”申博會

                  2017年 10 月 13-15日

                  申博

                  召集人:杜宣瑩、侯深、古麗巍
                  (申博)

                  “Nets at Work: Representing Connection in History”
                  A Symposium to be held at Renmin University of China, Beijing

                  13-15 October 2017

                  Sponsored by the Young Historians’ Workshop, Renmin University of China

                  Convener: Tu Hsuan-ying, Hou Shen, Gu Liwei
                  (School of History, RUC)

                  主旨說明

                   
                      即使我們生活的信息時代(information age)已被稱爲網絡社會(network society),卻依然很難回答這樣一個問題aaa,即aaaaa,將源自16世紀的“網絡”一詞aaaaa,用於現代社會和文化分析的具體動因是什麼aaa?當John Barnes從曼徹斯特來到挪威的一個漁村aaaa,完成他作爲人類學家的成年禮(田野調查)時aaa,是什麼觸動了他aaaa,而創造出這樣一個比喻性卻又是圖像化的術語和分析方式aaa?雖然我們能勾勒出John Barnes可能的思想淵源和學術脈絡aaa,比如格式塔和結構功能主義aaaaa,但是aaa,無論理論和思想的路線如何清晰aaa,當我們把網絡的圖像化模式與前兩者相對比時aaaaa,依然能感覺到視覺性上的鴻溝aaaa。
                  
                  
                       不過aaa,這個詞彙的出現似乎又不那麼突兀aaaa。在我們生活的空間中aaaaa,網絡處處可見aaaaa。這些網絡千差萬別aaaa,從菌絲連接真菌的生物性網絡aaa,到鐵路網絡aaaa,再到現代人類賴以交流卻不可見的電磁二進制網絡aaaaa。John Barnes可能是在生活空間中的網絡圖像中獲得啓發aaaa,或者aaaaa,他僅僅是在漁村的寂寥中aaaa,懷念起了他在曼徹斯特的老師Max Gluckman、同事Clyde Mitchell、Elizabeth Bottaaa。他們構成的研究共同體顯然也是一種關係(relationship)構成的網絡aaaaa。
                  
                  
                       John Barnes創造的這個概念試圖在整體文化和社會結構的籠罩之下找到描述結構與流動之間張力的途徑aaa。上個世紀的後半頁aaaa,它在大西洋兩岸頗受歡迎aaa,特別是在哈佛和曼切斯特aaaa。以其爲基礎的社會網絡分析(social network analysis)aaa,可以將大量的數據納入其中而產生圖像化的分析結果aaaaa,這顯然迎合了當時社會科學兩個極重要的“幻想”aaaaa。在當代社會aaaa,網絡的意義已經突破了學術界的邊界aaa。它成爲了一個動詞aaaaa,去社交(to network)成爲當代職業和私人人際交往的核心觀念aaa。而以其爲基本理念的各種社交媒體(social media)aaaaa,在近30年內aaaaa,極大地改變着大衆的生活aaaa。
                  
                  
                       不過aaaa,這個概念對於歷史學是否太過現代了aaa?請不要忘記aaaa,時間同樣在網絡中延展aaaaa。地球及其上各種有機與無機物的進化aaaaa,從來不是線性的漸進過程aaaa,而是在層層網絡的相互影響下形成的多維發散aaa。從地球的深層歷史進入人類文明的演化aaaa,網絡層疊交織aaaa,構成時間維度中新舊、古今的相對性aaa。因此aaaaa,網絡不僅僅是一種假設意義上的聯繫aaa,它也意味着aaaaa,在空間、人類和非人類的行動者之間aaaaa,存在一種直接或者間接的功能性連接aaa。它們以物質、思想或實踐的方式展現出來aaaa。作爲一個圖像化的分析工具aaa,網絡(network)不只是一張“網”(web)aaaa,其上的點、線乃至它們構成的面aaa,都可以是一種觀察的角度和路徑aaaaa。點不只是一個關係的彙集之處(cluster)aaaa,也是社會位置乃至角色aaa。而線aaaaa,也不只是關聯aaa,可以是傳遞的容器aaaa,也可以是載體aaaaa。兩點之間的關係可以是單線的aaaa,也可以是多線的aaaaa,可以密集aaa,也可以疏離aaa。它可以展示中心化的過程aaaa,卻也是去中心分析的利器aaaa。多個維度可以在一個網絡中共存aaaaa,比如它可以展示社會關係的階層性aaaa,同時也可以描述社會關係如何超越階層aaa;可以將面對面的關係與毫不相識的關係融入到一個網絡之中aaaa。另外aaaaa,我們之所以選擇網絡而非“網”aaaa,在於後者aaaa,無論在生態或文化層面aaa,強調被動地建構aaa;而前者aaaaa,則在被設計、運行的同時aaaa,往往超越建構者的想象aaaaa,直接參與空間與時間的演化之中aaa。它並非僅是歷史活動的場景或方式aaaaa,而是在其自身的結構當中aaa,催生、激化、限制社會、文化與各種生物的活動aaa。
                  
                  
                       2017年“寫歷史:實踐中的反思”會議主題從差異轉向網絡aaaaa,追問差異如何相關聯aaaaa,織就歷史和現代世界的種種aaaa。在這裏aaaa,網絡既可以是分析工具aaaaa,也可以是討論對象aaaa。我們希望關注各種網絡aaaaa,包括關於這些網絡的概念aaa,這些網絡如何建成aaaa,維持aaaaa,直至解體aaaa,以及在比喻的意義上aaa,網絡如何在歷史中的不同空間之間發揮作用aaaa。我們希望參與者能對物質性和非物質性的網絡進行歷史考察aaaa,並將不同地域和學科的視野帶入我們的討論中aaaa。同時aaaa,我們也在追問aaaaa,當人文科學與數字化的工具相遇aaaaa,大量而複雜數據建立出各種類型的網絡描述之後aaaa,我們在點、線、關係的密度、關係的強度之外還能發現哪些新的觀察角度aaaa。同時aaaaa,它們對建構多維度的歷史圖景有何幫助aaaa?
                  
                  
                   在此次會議中aaa,我們將集中討論以下議題:
                  
                  
                   地理知識的傳播網絡(召集人:胡恆)
                  
                  
                       地理知識的形成雖來自於對物質世界的感知與觀察aaaa,但因地域、人羣、文化的差異而呈現爲多元的結構aaaa。地理知識的傳播同樣以其多主體、多途徑、多層次、多面向的展開過程aaaa,而構成一個複雜的知識網絡aaaa,其面貌迄今仍晦暗不明aaaaa。本組以“地理知識的傳播網絡”爲題aaa,既關注近代以來中西之間地理新知識的傳播史與接受史aaaaa,也關注中國古代地理知識傳播與疆域拓展、交通貿易、宗教文化、商業出版、文書編纂之間的關係aaaa;既關注地理知識之間的內在關聯aaaa,也關注地理知識傳播的主體、路徑以及選擇機制aaa;既關注鑄就精英地理學知識的學術網絡aaaa,也關注一般民衆地理知識的來源與結構aaaa,但絕非是將二者對立起來而是試圖尋求內在的互動機制aaa。
                  
                  
                   近代中國的文化網絡與政治實踐(召集人:高波) 
                  
                  
                       陳寅恪論中古史aaaa,以文化爲一大關鍵要素aaaaa。晚清民國世運由治而亂aaaaa,局面與魏晉以降相似aaaaa。加以西風東漸aaaa,中西文化互競互滲、重疊交錯aaaa,教育、階級、地域、民族等因素亦紐結於其間aaaaa。若以階段而論aaaaa,從自強運動到共產主義革命aaaaa,伴隨着不同的政治實踐aaa,文化網絡持續地破缺重組aaaaa;而政治實踐本身的內容與形式aaaaa,亦因之不斷變動aaaa。在此過程中aaa,不同羣體相繼登場aaaaa,既擔當文化網絡的織造者與政治實踐的主體aaaaa,又受此種網絡與實踐的塑造與制約aaa。本組即擬從文化網絡與政治實踐的互動中aaaaa,尋找理解近代中國變遷的可能性aaaa。
                  
                  
                   近代歐洲的思想網絡 (召集人:王文婧)
                  
                  
                       “若不承認思想家們互相影響、互相連接aaa,就不可能寫出一部歐洲思想史aaaaa。”Friedrich Heer在他的《歐洲思想史》中如是說aaaa。近代歐洲的思想領域羣星璀璨aaaaa,推動着歐洲甚至是整個世界智力事業的發展aaaaa。思想家們(包括神學家、哲學家、科學家、詩人、藝術家等)的思想觀念及其發展歷程也因此在歷史研究中得到了普遍關注aaaa。不過aaaaa,正如Friedrich Heer指出的aaaa,任何觀念和想法都不是無本之木aaaaa,其廣泛傳播也絕非偶然:它們不僅是過去與現在的遭遇邂逅aaaa,更是其時各種觀點思潮碰撞交鋒的結果aaaaa。因此aaaa,對歐洲思想的研究不僅應該包括尋找某一思想的學術譜系aaa,努力繪製其背後的社會網絡圖景也應是題中之意aaaaa。
                  
                  
                   糾纏於環境之網(召集人:侯深、柯安慈 Agnes Kneitz)
                  
                  
                       智人並非孤獨飄蕩於地球行星的物種aaaaa,其生命歷程與各種其他物種:植物、動物、微生物相糾纏aaa,共同構建了廣闊而多層次的生命之網aaaaa。這個網絡因爲人類以及其他物種的遷移而不斷擴張aaaaa,其各自在此網之中所佔據的生態位也不斷髮生改變aaa。人類歷史的演化無從避免地構織於此網絡之中aaaa,人類物質的豐裕與匱缺aaaa,其權力的消長與分佈aaa,其思想的演繹與碰撞aaaaa,都同此網中的其他生命息息相關aaaaa。而無論其所馴化的物種aaaa,抑或尚在自生自滅的野生生命aaa,都不間斷地在人類生命歷程中留下它們的印記aaaaa,或變作能源aaa,或成爲食物aaaa,或引發疾病aaaa,或被賦予某種神性、美學與精神的價值aaaaa,或因爲人類有意或無心之舉而至滅絕aaa。本組意在考察這一環境之網的演化過程aaaaa,探尋人類與其生存之境之間一時不可或歇的糾結歷史aaaaa。
                  
                  
                   親疏有別:人際網絡中的學人與學術(召集人:姜萌)
                  
                  
                       “學術者aaaa,乃天下之公器”aaaaa。不過aaaa,地分南北aaaaa,人有親疏aaaa。學緣、地緣、血緣重重裹纏下的學人aaaaa,對待學術往往難以純粹灑脫aaaa。既如亞里士多德aaa,也要藉助“吾愛吾師aaaa,吾更愛真理”aaaaa,讓自己超脫人際網絡的束縛aaaa。“人言人殊”與“好丹非素”的背後aaaa,總能看到“親疏有別”aaaa。學人生生死死aaaaa,學術起起落落aaaaa,定情誼aaaa,別異同aaa,惺惺相惜或恩恩怨怨aaa,學術的世界總有漣漪aaaa。“天下一致而百慮aaa,同歸而殊途”aaa?或許aaaa。
                  
                  
                   網絡、組織與歷史時期的社會(召集人:林展) 
                  
                  
                       每一個個體都與網絡發生聯繫aaaa。這裏的網絡可能是一個商業組織aaaa,人們以此傳遞信息、知識aaaa,解決衝突aaa。網絡也可能是交通網絡這樣的基礎設施aaaa,人羣、物流、信息與資本通過交通網絡彙集和擴散aaa,但交通網絡同時也可能連接了疾病與瘟疫aaa。本專題的四篇報告aaa,將分別從信息傳遞、社會組織、交通網絡的角度aaa,分析明清至民國時期aaa,人們的經濟活動、社會衝突、疾病傳播等aaa。 
                  
                  
                  信息網絡中的權力流動(召集人:杜宣瑩、古麗巍) 
                  
                      信息網絡不僅僅是消息及知識的傳遞媒介aaaaa,亦是爭奪利益的籌碼aaaa,國家各機構及勢力羣體建立和控制多種信息網絡aaaa,從而構成對國家社會的管理和控制aaaa,透過信息的流動往往可以觀察出其映射的權力版圖aaaaa。這些機構及勢力羣體更藉由控管信息以競逐權力aaaaa,導致權力版圖的轉移與政治結構的轉型aaaa。信息網絡中的各環節aaaaa,既包括信息傳遞過程中的起訖點、不同行政層級、不同地理單元之間的博弈aaaa;也涵括信息網絡中各個層級的參與者aaaaa,上至君王與統治菁英aaaaa,下至次級行政層的吏、門客aaa,以及地方鄉紳aaaa,或是位處信息末端的平民aaa,乃至於在傳統研究中被貶抑噤聲的女性aaaa,皆受限於性別、活動空間aaaa,與信息性質等因素aaaa,在各權力活動中的此消彼長aaaa,催化權力在階級間與政權空間內的流動、轉移aaaaa。而這些信息之載體aaa,包括依託於政務文書的編撰、情報系統之監管、出版審查aaaa,與文教禮儀制度等aaaaa,不僅形塑階級或敵我意識形態aaaaa,也塑成一系列權力網絡aaaa。 
                  
                  

                  Thesis Statement

                   
                      Even though the information age in which we are living has already been called the network society, it is still difficult for us to answer what was motivated the application of the 16th century word “network” in this modern society and cultural analysis. When John Barnes left Manchester for a fishing village in Norway to accomplish his rite of passage (field research), what after all inspired him to create such a figurative but also visualized jargon and means of analysis? Although we may demarcate the possible intellectual origins and academic lineage of John Barnes, i.e. Gestalt and structural functionalism, such clear theoretic and intellectual route fails to fill the gap of visuality when we compare the two theories with the figurative model of network.
                  
                       On the other hand, however, the emergence of the word seems not so abrupt. We find network everywhere in our living spaces. These networks vary in a wide range, from the biological networks where hyphae connect fungi, to the railway network, to the electromagnetic binary network that we rely on for communication but invisible. John Barnes might have acquired his inspiration from those network images in the living spaces. Or it was likely that he might have reminisced his professor Max Gluckman and colleagues like Clyde Mitchell and Elizabeth Bott in the lonesomeness of the fishing village. The research community established by them was obviously a network founded on a certain relationship.
                  
                       The concept coined by John Barnes intends to find the channel to describe the tensions between structure and flows under the cover (shadow?) of comprehensive culture and social structure. In the latter half of the 20th century, the concept was embraced in the Transatlantic community, especially at Harvard and Manchester. The social network analysis based on it is able to incorporate a mass amount of data to generate visualized outcomes, which catered to two crucial “fantasies” of the contemporary social sciences. In today’s society, the significance of network has already broken out of its academic boundaries. It has become a verb: to network is the key concept for nowadays’ professional and private communication. And various social media based on this concept has changed the life of the public dramatically.
                  
                       Can historians use this concept, or is it too modern for us? Can we use it to talk about the connections between deep time and contemporary events, connecting the present generation to our most ancient ancestors? The evolution of planet earth has never followed a simple progressive line; on the contrary, it has, like any network, been a complex web stretching across multiple dimensions and whole epochs of time. From the deep history of planet earth to the evolution of human civilization, networks have been overlapping and entangled which has formed the relativeness of the “new” and the “old”, and the “ancient” and the “modern” in different time scales. Therefore, networks suggest not merely an assumptive connection, but also some direct or indirect functional links among spaces, humans and nonhuman activists. They unfold themselves in material, intellectual or practical ways.
                  
                       To think about networks is not merely to imagine some entangling “web” but rather to see all the individual dots, lines, and surfaces composed of them could all serve as angles and approaches for investigation. A single dot in the historical web might be viewed not only as a “relationship” or state of “being related” and interdependent but also a social position or role. And a line is not just about connection; it is also a container or carrier of messages. The relationship between two dots in time could be unilinear or multilinear, dense or loose. It could demonstrate the process of increasing centralization, or, as it unravels, it could suggest decentralization. Multiple dimensions can co-exist in one network. For example, network analysis in history could show relationships become stratified but also how they might transcend stratification. Some network relations may be face-to-face while others are abstract and faceless. Furthermore, we choose network instead of “web” because the latter emphasizes passive construction no matter on ecological or cultural level; yet the former, while it is designed and ran, often transcends the conception of the constructors and participate in the transformation of time and space. It serves not only a stage or means for historical activities, but also stimulates, intensify, or limit various social, cultural, or biological activities in its own structure.
                  
                       In 2017, the theme of the conference series “Writing History: Reflection during Practice” shifts from difference to network, asking how differences have been linked and woven into the panorama of the historical and contemporary world. In this conference, network will be defined both as a means of analysis and a subject for debate. We will attempt to pay attention to various networks, how they have been built, maintained or broken down. We are also interested in understanding how networks function in different spaces of history on a figurative level. We hope that our participants investigate both material and non-material networks historically and bring perspectives from different regions and disciplines into our discussion. We also would like to ask when humanities encounter digital means and established various types of network description based on numerous and complex data, what new perspectives we could discover besides dots, lines, the density and intensity of relationships. Meanwhile, how helpful could they be in terms of constructing a multi-dimensional historical landscape?
                  
                       We are going to focus on these subthemes in this conference:
                  
                       1.The dissemination network of geographic knowledge (Convener: HU Heng)
                  
                       2.The cultural network and political practice of modern China (Convener: GAO Bo)
                  
                       3.The intellectual network in modern Europe (Convener: WANG Wenjing)
                  
                       4.The entanglements of humans with their environments (Conveners: HOU Shen and Agnes KNEITZ)
                  
                       5.The distinction between the near and the distant: The intellectuals and their work in the human network (Convener: JIANG Meng)
                  
                       6.Network, Organization, and Historical Societies (Convener, LIN Zhan)
                  
                       7.The circulation of power in the network of information (Conveners: TU Hsuan-ying and GU Liwei)
                  
                  

                  會議議程
                  Conference Program

                  2017年10 月13日(週五)
                  14時至 17時 30 分
                  Friday, 13 October 2017
                  14:00-17:30

                  報到 Registration
                  14:00-14:50

                  開幕 Opening
                  主持人:高波 申博
                  Chair: Gao Bo (School of History, RUC)
                  地點:中國人民大學藝術學院音樂廳(學生活動中心對面)
                  Venue: Auditorium, School of Art, RUC

                  14:50-15:10 致辭 Opening Remarks
                  致辭人:黃興濤 申博
                  Speaker: Huang Xingtao (School of History, RUC)

                  15:10-15:30 合影 Photographs

                  人大青年史學工作坊“講歷史”系列演講
                  “Speaking History” Series of Lectures

                  15:30-16:30

                  演講一:尋找卵子:性別、分泌之謎與輔助生殖技術的流動
                  Lecture I: In Search of Eggs: The Dynamics of Reproduction and the Establishment of
                  Assisted Reproductive Technologies in China, 1950-1980
                  主講人:劉雪婷(筆名:淡豹)“正午故事”主筆
                  Speaker: Liu Xueting(Journalist and Writer)

                  16:30-17:30

                  演講二:網絡中漂移的實體aaaaa?——殺死拉美西斯二世的機關槍與當下寫作疾病史的半徑
                  Lecture II: The Entities Shifting in Networks?: The Machine Gun Which Would Have Killed
                  Ramesses II and the Radius of Current Writing on History of Diseases
                  主講人:陳昊 申博
                  Speaker: Chen Hao (School of History, RUC)

                   

                  2017年10 月14日(週六)
                  Saturday, 14 October 2017

                   
                  9:00- 11:30 (10:10 -10:30 茶歇Break)
                  
                  Session A
                  
                  信息網絡中的權力流動 (The Circulation of Power in the Network of Information) 
                  
                  人文樓三層會議室 (3rd-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  
                  主持人:杜宣瑩 (申博) 
                  
                  Chair: Tu Hsuan-ying (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  初慶東 (Chu Qingdong) 華中師範大學歷史文化學院 (School of History and Culture, Central China Normal University) 
                  信息監管與國家秩序:近代早期英格蘭文書國家的興起 (Information Surveillance and State Order: The Rise of the Paper State in Early Modern England) 
                  
                  閆建飛 (Yan Jianfei) 湖南大學嶽麓書院 (Yuelu Academy, Hunan University) 唐後期五代的州郡專達 (A Study on Prefectures from Zhuanda in the Late Tang and the Five Dynasties) 
                  
                  杜宣瑩 (Tu Hsuan-ying) 申博 (School of History, RUC) 門客入侵——弗朗西斯‧沃爾辛厄姆之祕書處與都鐸晚期的官僚政治 (The Invasion of Clients: Francis Walsingham’s Secretariat and the Politics of Late Tudor Bureaucracy) 
                  
                  古麗巍 (Gu Liwei) 中國人民大學附中&歷史學院唐宋史研究中心 (RUC) 宋代樞密院承旨司:從“西院直公”到樞府屬司 (The Reception of Edicts in the Bureau of Military Affairs in the Song Dynasty) 
                  
                  總評人:方震華(臺灣大學歷史學系) 
                  General Commentator: Fang Cheng-hua (Department of History, Taiwan University) 
                  
                  Session B 
                  
                  近代中國的文化網絡與政治實踐 (The Cultural Networks and Political Practices in Modern China) 
                  
                  人文樓四層會議室 (4th-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:高波 (申博) 
                  Chair: Gao Bo (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  韓策 (Han Ce) 北京大學歷史學系 (Department of History, Peking University) 
                  評議人:周月峯(Critic: Zhou Yuefeng) 
                  江督非湘人不可:晚清湘人督江格局的形成(The Governor of Liangjiang Must Be From Hunan: The Formation of the Hunanese Governance over Liangjiang District in the Late Qing Dynasty) 
                  
                  高波 (Gao Bo) 申博 (School of History, RUC) 
                  評議人:陸胤(Critic: Lu Yin) 
                  晚清京師政治網絡中“同治”話語的形成與變異(The Formation and Evolution of the Discourse of “Tongzhi” in the Central Political Network of Peking during the Late Qing Dynasty) 
                  
                  陸胤 (Lu Yin) 北京大學中文系 (Department of Chinese Literature, Peking University) 評議人:韓策(Critic: Han Ce) 
                  章太炎的經學與文學:在讀寫文化的視野 (Taiyan Zhang’s Classical Studies and Literature: From the Perspective of Literacy) 
                  
                  周月峯 (Zhou Yuefeng) 華中師範大學中國近代史研究所 (Institute of Modern Chinese History, Central China Normal University) 
                  評議人:季劍青(北京市社會科學院文化研究所) 
                  Critic: Ji Jianqing, Institute of Cultural Studies, Beijing Academy of Social Sciences 另一場新文化運動:梁啓超諸人的文化努力與五四思想界(Another New Cultural Movement: The Cultural Enterprise around Qichao Liang and Its Relation with the May Fourth Intelligentsia)
                  
                  

                  2017年10 月14日(週六)
                  Saturday, 14 October 2017

                   
                  14:00-15:30
                  Session A 
                  親疏有別:人際網絡中的學人與學術 (The Distinction Between the Near and the Distant: The Intellectuals and Their Work in the Human Network) 
                  人文樓三層會議室 (3rd-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:姜萌 (申博) 
                  Chair: Jiang Meng (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  王堅 (Wang Jian) 河北師範大學歷史文化學院 (School of History and Culture, Hebei Normal University) 
                  論清代中後期中州夏峯北學推進的地緣、學緣因素——兼論清學史敘述模式的重塑 (The Geographical and Academic Factors Promoting the Xia Feng North School in the Central Plains during the Late Qing Dynasty: Reshaping the Narrative Model of Qing Studies) 
                  
                  姜萌 (Jiang Meng) 申博 (School of History, RUC) 
                  清末民初的學人認同與知識生產——以《清史稿》編纂爲中心的探討 (Scholars’ Identity and Knowledge Production at the End of the Qing Dynasty: A Study Focusing on the Compilation of The Draft Of Qing Dynasty History) 
                  
                  王慶明 (Wang Qingming) 南開大學周恩來政府管理學院 (Zhou Enlai School of Management, Nankai University) 
                  國企產權變革中工人的集體話語與個體表達:單位人口述史的方法論反思 (The Collective Discourse and Individual Expression of Workers during the Property Right Reform of State-owned Enterprise: Reexamining the Oral History Approach of Danweiren (the Persons Attached to and Identified with Their Employers) 
                  
                  總評人:王雨磊(華南理工大學公共管理學院) 
                  General Commentator: Wang Yulei (School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology) 
                  
                  15:30 -16:00 茶歇 (Break) 
                  
                  16:00 -17:30 
                  Session B 
                  近代歐洲的思想網絡 (The Intellectual Network in Modern Europe) 
                  人文樓三層會議室 (3rd-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:王文婧 (申博) 
                  Chair: Wang Wenjing (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  盧鎮 (Lu Zhen) 河南大學歷史文化學院 (School of History and Culture, Henan University) 
                  評議人:王文婧(Critic: Wang Wenjing) 
                  “保守”還是“革命”:以社會關係網絡爲視角探析皮科的兩個臉譜 (“Conservative” or “Revolutionary:” The Interpretation of the Two Faces of Pico in the Social Network Perspective) 
                  
                  周保巍 (Zhou Baowei) 華東師範大學政治學系 (Department of Politics, East China Normal University) 
                  評議人:王濤(Critic: Wang Tao) 
                  啓蒙與“a More Enlarged View”:《國富論》與斯密的信息網絡 (The Enlightenment and “a More Enlarged View”: The Wealth of Nations and the Information Network of Adam Smith) 
                  
                  王濤(Wang Tao)南京大學歷史學院(School of History, Nanjing University) 
                  評議人:周保巍(Critic: Zhou Baowei) 
                  18世紀歐洲啓蒙思想家的人際與思想網絡:基於維基百科人物詞條(The Networks of Relationship and Knowledge between the Enlightenment Thinkers in 18th-Century Europe: The Example of Wikipedia) 
                  
                  14:00 -17:30 
                  Session C 
                  地理知識的傳播網絡 (The Dissemination Network of Geographic Knowledge) 
                  人文樓四層會議室 (4th-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:胡恆 (申博) 
                  Chair: Hu Heng (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  潘威 (Pan Wei)aaa,馬錦絹 (Ma Jinjuan) 陝西師範大學西北歷史環境與經濟社會發展研究院 (Northwest Institute of Historical Environment and Socio-Economic Development, Shaanxi Normal University) 
                  評議人:蕭凌波(Critic: Xiao Lingbo) 
                  清代黃河志樁報汛制度網絡的運作 (The Information Management Network of the Yellow River Floods in the Qing Dynasty) 
                  
                  蕭凌波 (Xiao Lingbo) 申博 (School of History, RUC) 
                  評議人:潘威(Critic: Pan Wei) 
                  1736-1911年華北饑荒指數序列重建及其與水旱災害的時空關係(The Spatio-Temporal Distribution of Famines and Its Relationship With Floods & Droughts in North China, 1736-1911) 
                  
                  劉傳飛 (Liu Chuanfei) 中國海洋大學文學與新聞傳播學院(College of Liberal Arts, Journalism and Communication, Ocean University of China) 
                  評議人:張佳靜(Critic: Zhang Jiajing) 
                  中西地圖傳統交匯下的清末《新疆全省輿地圖》(The Complete Atlas of Xinjiang (Xinjiang Quansheng Yuditu) Produced in the Convergence of the Sino-Western Cartographic Traditions in the Late Qing Dynasty) 
                  
                  張佳靜 (Zhang Jiajing) 中國科學院大學人文學院 (School of Humanities, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences) 
                  評議人:劉傳飛(Critic: Liu Chuanfei) 
                  地圖暈渲法在近代中國的傳播與應用 (The Dissemination and Application of the Hill Shading Method in Modern China) 
                  
                  胡迪 (Hu Di) 南京師範大學地理科學學院 (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University) 
                  評議人:胡恆(Critic: Hu Heng) 
                  歷史地理信息時空建模與定位方法研究 (The Spatio-Temporal Modeling And Positioning Approach of Historical Geographic Information) 
                  
                  胡恆 (Hu Heng) 申博 (School of History, RUC) 
                  評議人:胡迪(Critic: Hu Di) 
                  GIS所見“衝繁疲難”與清代政治地理格局初探 (The Chong-Fan-Pi-Nan System and the Political Geographic Pattern in the Qing Dynasty Based on GIS) 
                  
                  

                  2017年10 月15日(週日)
                  Sunday, 15 October 2017

                   
                  9:00-11:30(10:10 -10:30 茶歇Break)
                  Session A 
                  糾纏於環境之網 (The Entanglements of Humans with Their Environments) 
                  人文樓三層會議室 (3rd-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:侯深 (申博) Chair: Hou Shen (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  段蕾 (Duan Lei) 中國人民大學校長辦公室 (Presidential Office, RUC) 20世紀80年代的官廳水庫治理:一個環境與政治的互動視角 (The Regulation of the Guanting Reservoir in the 1980s: A Perspective on the Interaction between Environment and Politics) 
                  
                  柯安慈 (Agnes Kneitz) 慕尼黑大學蕾切爾·卡森環境與社會中心 (The Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München) 人類—疾病—網絡:1910年德佔青島之肺鼠疫 (Human-Disease-Networks: The 1910 Pneumonic Plague in German Qingdao) 
                  
                  劉向陽 (Liu Xiangyang) 河北師範大學歷史文化學院 (School of History and Culture, Hebei Normal University) 
                  美國環境治理中經濟手段與政治力量的交織——以成本—效益分析的運用爲例(The Intertwining of the Economic Means and Political Power in American Environmental Governance: A Case Study Applying Cost-Benefit Analysis) 
                  
                  王瓚瑋 (Wang Zanwei) 中國社會科學院日本研究所 (The Institute of Japanese Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences) 
                  記憶之網中的日本阪神淡路大地震 (The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake in the Memory Web) 
                  
                  徐軼傑 (Xu Yijie) 中國社會科學院當代中國研究所 (The Institute of Contemporary China Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences ) 
                  全球地方性環境危機:北京對於空氣污染的不懈鬥爭 (Global-Local Environmental Crises: Beijing’s Persistent Fight Against Air Pollution) 
                  
                  總評人:曹牧(天津師範大學歷史文化學院) 
                  General Commentator: Cao Mu (School of History and Culture, Tianjin Normal University) 
                  
                  Session B 
                  網絡、組織與歷史時期的社會 (Network, Organization, and Historical Societies) 
                  人文樓四層會議室 (4th-Floor Conference Room of Humanities Building) 
                  主持人:林展 (申博) 
                  Chair: Lin Zhan (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  彭凱翔 (Peng Kaixiang) 河南大學經濟學院 (School of Economics, Henan University) 
                  評議人:郝煜(Critic: Hao Yu) 
                  明清中國的世俗知識傳播與市場運作 (The Diffusion of Popular Knowledge and the Operation of the Market in Ming and Qing China) 
                  
                  周琳 (Zhou Lin) 四川大學歷史文化學院 (School of History and Culture, Sichuan University) 
                  評議人:胡祥雨(申博) Critic: Hu Xiangyu (School of History, RUC) 
                  爲何毆鬥不止?——乾隆至同治時期的重慶腳伕組織(The Logic of Fighting: The Porter Organization of Qing Dynasty Chongqing, 1773-1874) 
                  
                  郝煜 (Hao Yu) 北京大學經濟學院 (School of Economic, Peking University) 
                  評議人:朱滸(申博) Critic: Zhu Hu (School of History, RUC) 
                  太平天國、紳士的崛起和慈善組織的發展 (The Taiping Rebellion, Charity Institutions and the Rise Of Gentry) 
                  
                  李楠 (Li Nan) 上海財經大學經濟學院 (School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics) 
                  評議人:林展(Critic: Lin Zhan) 
                  交通網絡與疫病傳播:基於近代東北流行性鼠疫的考察aaaa,1880-1911 (Transportation Network and the Spread of Disease: The Manchurian Plague,1880-1911) 
                  
                  

                  2017年10 月15日(週日)
                  Sunday, 15 October 2017

                  閉幕 Closing
                  主持人:侯深 申博
                  Chair: Hou Shen (School of History, RUC)
                  地點:中國人民大學逸夫會議中心第一會議室
                  Venue: Yifu Conference Center, RUC

                  13:30-15:00 主題演講Keynote Speech
                  共和國的女科學家及其知識網絡
                  Female Scientists in the People’s Republic of China and Their Networks of Knowledge
                  主講人:張藜 中國科學院大學人文學院
                  Speaker: Zhang Li (School of Humanities, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

                  15:00-15:30 茶歇 (Break)
                  15:30-17:00 圓桌會議 Roundtable Discussion

                   

                   主持人:侯深 (申博)
                  Moderator: Hou Shen (School of History, RUC) 
                  與談人:方震華 (臺灣大學歷史學系)、陸胤(北京大學中文系)、彭凱翔(河南大學經濟學院)、王雨磊(華南理工大學公共管理學院)、朱滸(申博) 
                  Speakers: Fang Cheng-hua (Department of History, Taiwan University), Lu Yin (Department of Chinese Literature, Peking University), Peng Kaixiang (School of Economics, Henan University), Wang Yulei (School of Public Administration, South China University of Technology), Zhu Hu (School of History, RUC) 
                  
                  

                  17:00-17:30致辭 Closing Remarks
                  關鍵詞的兔子洞與寫作的路標: “寫歷史:實踐中的反思”系列會議的後記與致謝
                  A Rabbit Hole of keywords and the Signposts of Writing: The Epilogue of the “Writing
                  History: Reflection During Practices” Symposiums Series
                  致辭人:陳昊 申博
                  Speaker: Chen Hao (School of History, RUC)